Jalgaon, May 16: In a significant development in the Suleiman Khan mob lynching murder case, the Jalgaon Sessions Court in Maharashtra has rejected bail applications for five accused individuals. This decision underscores the strength of the evidence against the defendants, indicating that the charges are of a serious nature.
On May 14, Additional Sessions Judge P. Banker denied the regular bail applications of accused Suraj Gurudas Bhoge and Krishna Raju Teli. Previously, the bail requests of Aditya Deore, Sajwal Teli, and Rishikesh Prabhakar were also dismissed by Sessions Judge Rajwarkar on February 21. Consequently, a total of five bail applications have been rejected thus far.
The Sessions Court, in its order issued on May 14, stated that there is substantial evidence against the accused, including CCTV footage, call detail records (CDR), eyewitness statements, and other critical evidence. The court further noted that the nature of the crime is extremely serious. Granting bail could potentially lead to witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and a negative impact on law and order.
Farooq Sheikh, a member of the Ekta organization, raised questions on social media regarding the court’s consistent rejection of bail for five accused based on the severity of the charges and the presence of sufficient evidence. He asked why the default bail for four other accused has not yet been revoked, implying that the administration is attempting to protect certain individuals by delaying proceedings.
The Jamner Court had granted default bail to the accused on the grounds that the charge sheet was not filed within the stipulated 90-day period. Sheikh mentioned that a petition to cancel the default bail has been filed in the Sessions Court. Despite hearings before two different judges, no order has been issued to date. When the matter was presented to a third judge on May 12, the next hearing was scheduled for June 10.
Sheikh expressed concern that this delay is causing significant unrest among the victim’s family and the Muslim community. He argued that if the court acknowledges the existence of solid evidence against the accused, those currently on default bail should have their bail revoked immediately. Otherwise, it sends a message that individuals involved in serious criminal activities are being shielded, even in grave cases.
–
My name is Ganpat Singh Choughan. I am an experienced content writer with 7 years of expertise in the field. Currently, I contribute to Daily Kiran, creating engaging and informative content across a variety of categories including technology, health, travel, education, and automobiles. My goal is to deliver accurate, insightful, and captivating information through my words to help readers stay informed and empowered.
Leave a Comment