Gurugram, April 25: Former Chief of Army Staff Manoj Mukund Naravane shared insights from his new book, which delves into the military’s role, the China-Pakistan dynamic, Operation Sindoor, and global security issues.
In an interview with a news agency, General Naravane addressed the controversy surrounding his previous book, “Four Star Destiny.” Here are key excerpts from the discussion.
Question: Your first book was fiction, which received a warm reception. What inspired you to write your new non-fiction book, “The Curious and the Classified: Unearthing Military Myths and Mysteries”?
Answer: This book contains 25 chapters, each telling a unique story. The idea came to me after reading Shashi Tharoor’s “A Wonderland of Words: Around the World in 101 Essays.” Inspired by its focus on the English language and concepts, I thought about writing a book on lesser-known, intriguing aspects of the military that the general public might not be aware of. That’s how this book began.
Question: Which chapter of your book is your favorite?
Answer: My favorite chapter is “Chak De Fatte.” It’s a slogan from my regiment. Whether in sports or boosting each other’s morale, we say “Chak De Fatte.” This phrase has gained popularity, even inspiring a film. However, few know its historical roots. It originates from battles between Sikhs and Mughals. When Sikh forces attacked Mughal camps, they would dismantle wooden bridges on their way back to prevent pursuit. During this, they would say, “Chak De Fatte,” meaning the task is complete. This historical truth is something many are unaware of, and all chapters in my book connect to similar military histories.
Question: Your book “Four Star Destiny” faced controversy even before its release. Rahul Gandhi brought it up in Parliament. Do you believe it was authentic?
Answer: As an author, I must say I haven’t seen the final copy of that book. I can’t comment on its origins or authenticity. The publisher has clarified that no official copy has been circulated, so I can’t speak on what has emerged publicly.
Question: A line from that book, “Do what you deem appropriate,” sparked significant debate. Was it misinterpreted?
Answer: The military is given complete freedom during operations, indicating the government’s trust in the armed forces. This should be viewed from that perspective. However, if someone chooses to interpret it negatively, like seeing a glass as half empty rather than half full, there’s little I can do.
Question: What would you say to those politicizing the military? Does it affect morale?
Answer: I don’t believe the military is being politicized. The Indian Army and other armed forces are entirely apolitical. Following orders from political leadership is the military’s duty, but that doesn’t mean the military has become political. Just as I expect my juniors to follow my orders, the Army Chief follows directives from the Defense Minister. This distinction is crucial.
Question: How did the Indian Army respond to the Chinese at the border? Is India capable of giving a strong response to China?
Answer: Military actions are a collective national effort, not just the work of the army or one organization. We acted in unity, which led to our success. Our actions forced the PLA to retreat. If that isn’t a victory, then what is? If people refuse to accept this, there’s nothing more I can say.
Question: Operation Sindoor is nearing its one-year mark. How do you view this operation and the subsequent developments?
Answer: Operation Sindoor marked a significant change. This time, we targeted not just terrorist hideouts but also their leadership headquarters. This approach was different from previous operations. The Defense Minister stated we would “strike from within,” sending a strong message to Pakistan that it would pay a heavy price for such actions.
Question: Every war teaches us something. What lessons has the Indian Army learned from the Iran-U.S. conflict?
Answer: Every war provides valuable lessons. The real insights come after the conflict ends when we analyze it. The current situation highlights the necessity for self-reliance across all sectors, whether in oil or critical minerals. We must be self-sufficient in every area.
Question: Pakistan often tries to exploit global tensions. How do you perceive this trend?
Answer: This is not new. Pakistan has a history of doing this. During the “Global War on Terror,” Pakistan positioned itself as an ally to the U.S. Similarly, during the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan, it became a frontline state to assist America. This has been a long-standing strategy, but its long-term effects have always been negative.
My name is Narendra Jijhontiya. I am an experienced content writer with several years of expertise in the field. Currently, I contribute to Daily Kiran, creating engaging and informative content across a variety of categories including TECHNOLOGY, health, travel, education, and automobiles. My goal is to deliver accurate, insightful, and captivating information through my words to help readers stay informed and empowered.
Leave a Comment