Hyderabad, August 31: BJP leader Sarita Agarwal has raised questions regarding Prime Minister Narendra Modi receiving the highest civilian honor from Uzbekistan. Her remarks come in response to comments made by AIMIM chief and Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi, as well as a controversial statement by Karnataka Congress minister Basavaraj Rayareddy, who claimed Islam is superior to other religions.
Agarwal questioned Owaisi’s intentions behind his remarks on Modi’s honor, particularly linking it to Babur’s homeland. She asked what justification there is for connecting Modi’s recognition to historical figures like Babur. “Is it appropriate to bow to Babur simply because he was associated with that region?” she inquired. Agarwal emphasized that Babur is often viewed as a tyrannical ruler, responsible for widespread violence and genocide. She argued that associating a modern honor with the actions of historical rulers is illogical.
She further stated that Modi’s recognition by Uzbekistan symbolizes the current friendly relations between the two nations. Through this honor, Uzbekistan has, in a sense, issued an apology for historical mistakes. By accepting the award, Modi has made it clear that despotic rulers like Babur are not ideals in today’s world. The past should not be repeatedly invoked to undermine Modi’s honor. Agarwal expressed confusion over the basis of Owaisi’s comments.
Additionally, Agarwal objected to Karnataka minister Basavaraj Rayareddy’s alleged statement that Islam is superior to other religions. She stated that every religion and community has its own beliefs, values, and ways of life. Individuals should have the freedom to practice their faith or choose another.
Agarwal stressed that public officials are expected to maintain an impartial perspective towards all religions and communities. Statements that elevate one religion above others can cast doubt on a minister’s impartiality. While individuals may choose to read the Quran or go on Hajj, it is inappropriate for someone in a constitutional position to declare one faith superior. Such comments may reflect narrow-mindedness or a desire to appease a particular community. Ministers must understand their responsibilities and avoid bias based on religion or community. Leaders in public office should strive to treat all citizens and religions equally.
Leave a Comment