New Delhi, June 25: A significant backlash has erupted against Maulana Syed Arshad Madani, the president of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, following his controversial comments on ‘jihad’. Both Muslim leaders and Hindu saints expressed their disapproval on Wednesday.
Addressing a meeting of the Jamiat’s Uttarakhand state executive, Madani stated that jihad was advocated during the country’s struggle against colonial rule in 1803. He emphasized that it is every Muslim’s duty to engage in jihad to liberate the nation from the shackles of slavery, a teaching he claims originates from madrasas. Those unaware of this, he argued, are ignorant.
Maulana Chaudhary Ifrahim Hussain, president of the Indian Social Workers Organization, criticized Madani’s statement, labeling it as entirely against the principles of Islam. He asserted that Islam prioritizes ‘taqwa’ (fear of Allah/purity), and the most pious individuals earn the highest respect and credibility. He contended that Madani’s remarks are politically motivated and disconnected from the genuine concerns of marginalized communities.
Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi, president of the All India Muslim Jamaat, pointed out that Madani failed to clarify the circumstances under which Muslims should engage in jihad and questioned its necessity in India. He referenced a scholarly text stating that jihad is unnecessary in a peaceful nation that allows freedom of religion, including Islam.
Maulana Syed Saif Abbas Naqvi added that specific conditions must be met for jihad, which do not apply today. He noted that only an infallible prophet or imam can authorize jihad, and none exist today.
Congress MP Tariq Anwar remarked that the term ‘jihad’ is inappropriate in a democracy. He highlighted the desire for brotherhood within the Hindu community and emphasized the need for unity among those who respect secularism and all religions.
Maharashtra Minister Nitesh Rane asserted that it is their right to eliminate jihadists, stating that anyone advocating jihad in a Hindu nation should face consequences. Similarly, Uttar Pradesh Minister Dharmapal Singh emphasized that justice should be equal for all, rejecting any notion of jihad that involves violence.
Saint Sitaram Das Maharaj stated that the country operates under the Constitution and laws, warning that those who advocate jihad will face dire consequences. He insisted that anyone engaging in jihad should prepare for severe repercussions.
Mahamantrishwar Swami Shaileshanand Puri expressed concern that such statements threaten communal harmony and social unity. He believes these ideologies aim to create division and weaken societal cohesion, urging the government to take necessary action against divisive rhetoric.
Mahant Raju Das from Hanumangarhi condemned Madani’s remarks as unfortunate and demonic, arguing that they promote jihadist terrorism and undermine humanity. He called for strict action against Madani.
Tensions continue to rise as various leaders respond to the implications of Madani’s comments, highlighting the need for dialogue and understanding in a diverse society.
Leave a Comment