New Delhi, April 7: The Delhi High Court issued a notice on Monday regarding former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s petition. Kejriwal has requested that the hearing of the excise policy case be transferred from Justice Swarna Kant Sharma’s bench to another bench.
This case is linked to a petition by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which challenges the trial court’s decision to acquit Kejriwal, former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, and other accused individuals.
At the beginning of the hearing, Kejriwal informed the court that he had filed a recusal application against Justice Sharma and requested it be recorded. He expressed his desire to personally present his arguments in this matter.
In response, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the CBI, strongly opposed the application, labeling the allegations as “baseless” and “contemptuous.” He stated that some individuals make a career out of making accusations, which constitutes a serious comment against institutions like the court.
Mehta further remarked that if Kejriwal wishes to appear personally, he must do so consistently. He emphasized, “The court is not a platform where someone can appear occasionally and then debate through a lawyer.”
He also pointed out that most parties, including Kejriwal, have yet to submit their responses. He warned that if the recusal application is denied, it could lead to contempt proceedings.
Kejriwal countered that according to procedure, an individual appearing personally cannot file applications directly without the court’s permission, hence his request should be recorded. He reiterated his intention to argue the case himself.
While hearing the matter, Justice Sharma issued a notice on the application and directed all parties to submit their responses. The court stated that if any other party wishes to file a similar application, they may do so for a consolidated hearing of all applications.
The court has instructed written submissions to be filed, scheduling the next hearing for April 13 at 2:30 PM.
It is noteworthy that the trial court, in its order on February 27, stated that there was insufficient evidence of a major conspiracy in the excise policy case for 2021-22, granting relief to all accused. The CBI has challenged this order in the High Court, deeming it “erroneous,” while the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has sought to remove certain comments made by the trial court.
Separately, Kejriwal has already approached the Supreme Court, challenging the rejection of his request to transfer the case to another bench.
My name is Bhupendra Singh Chundawat. I am an experienced content writer with several years of expertise in the field. Currently, I contribute to Daily Kiran, creating engaging and informative content across a variety of categories including technology, health, travel, education, and automobiles. My goal is to deliver accurate, insightful, and captivating information through my words to help readers stay informed and empowered.
Leave a Comment