Anantnag, October 5 (Daily Kiran) : In Anantnag, Gulam Ahmad Mir, the All India Congress Committee (AICC) General Secretary, has launched a strong critique against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) regarding the Ram Temple donation controversy. He claims that the BJP has undermined the faith of devotees. Mir revealed the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance’s (INDI Alliance) upcoming strategy to combat electoral malpractice, which includes a protest at the Election Commission office led by Rahul Gandhi on October 6, followed by a meeting with the President.
Mir stated that the situation has become a reality that many people fail to comprehend. He emphasized the importance of respecting all religions and accused the BJP of diverting funds collected for religious purposes. According to him, the donations intended for the temple have been misappropriated, with less going to religious activities and more used elsewhere.
He pointed out that the evidence suggests that the BJP’s rise from two to three hundred seats has compromised the faith of the devotees who contribute to the temple. Mir described the situation as an open game that even the staunchest supporters of the BJP are now questioning.
Mir further explained that the first phase of the INDI Alliance’s plan involves district-level press conferences and management committees. In the second phase, larger rallies will occur in select states. The third phase will culminate in a protest at the Parliament in Delhi.
On October 6, alongside Rahul Gandhi, all coalition partners will approach the Election Commission to seek answers. They also plan to present a memorandum to the President on October 15-16, highlighting threats to democracy.
Mir underscored that two Election Commissioners have revealed how the Chief Election Commissioner has manipulated democratic processes, presenting this as undeniable evidence.
He concluded by referencing the tradition in India that final decisions from courts, especially those involving five judges, are respected. He argued that the same principle should apply to the Election Commission, where two commissioners raise questions while one engages in misconduct.
Leave a Comment