Thiruvananthapuram, June 13: Pinarayi Vijayan, who has served as Kerala’s Chief Minister for a decade, has recently shown a noticeable change in his approach. Historically, his style was characterized by authority and a deliberate distance from the public. However, recent events have prompted a shift in his demeanor.
Shortly after taking office in 2016, Vijayan discontinued the weekly media briefings that had been a longstanding tradition in Kerala politics. He made it clear that he would engage with the media on his terms, rather than responding to journalists’ requests. For a long time, he maintained a distance from the press, rarely engaging in open dialogue.
During his first term, after the devastation caused by Cyclone Ockhi in 2017, he faced backlash for arriving days later to the affected coastal areas. His late arrival led to anger from local residents, forcing him to leave hastily.
Throughout his second term, critics have repeatedly accused him of being inaccessible, especially during times when public empathy was expected. His absence during various tragedies became a recurring point of contention.
However, the political landscape shifted dramatically following a significant setback for the Left Democratic Front (LDF) in the assembly elections. This defeat sparked criticism not only from his allies but also from factions within the CPI(M), questioning his governance style and perceived arrogance.
Increased scrutiny from central agencies, including investigations related to his family and questioning of his daughter, has added to the pressure on Vijayan. The political atmosphere around him has become increasingly challenging, with some questioning his continued leadership role.
Against this backdrop, Vijayan’s recent public appearances have drawn attention. Earlier this week, he was seen meeting the family of a victim killed in a wild animal attack, a stark contrast to his previous criticisms of maintaining distance during such tragedies.
Another notable change occurred in Kozhikode, where Vijayan unexpectedly addressed the media on Saturday morning. This interaction was significant not only for his willingness to speak but also for the manner in which he engaged.
Gone was the familiar image of a Chief Minister who would make statements and leave. His body language reflected a clear change; he appeared more composed, patient, and less confrontational. Unlike in the past, when he would often leave abruptly, he remained engaged during the conversation.
Whether this change is permanent or a response to shifting political circumstances remains to be seen. However, it is evident that there is a shift in public perception; a leader who once distanced himself from the public is now attempting to reconnect. Additionally, questions arise about whether this effort is coming too late, especially as conditions in his hometown of Kannur have also changed significantly.
Leave a Comment