Tensions Rise Over Delimitation Amendment Bill as Government Seeks Opposition Cooperation
The Indian government and opposition clash over the Delimitation Amendment Bill, with calls for cooperation amid ongoing parliamentary tensions.
New Delhi, October 19 (Daily Kiran) : The debate surrounding the Delimitation Amendment Bill has intensified in the Indian Parliament, marking a growing rift between the government and the opposition. Following Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge’s request for a multi-party meeting through a letter to the Prime Minister, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has responded with his own correspondence.
In his letter, Rijiju commended Kharge for reaching out to the Parliamentary Affairs Ministry. He noted that Kharge’s request for a multi-party meeting to discuss the delimitation amendment before considering it was acknowledged. Rijiju aimed to clarify the government’s position regarding the opposition’s claims about the Parliament not being adjourned.
Addressing concerns raised by the opposition, Rijiju stated, “Regarding your observation that 64 days have passed without the Parliament being adjourned, I would like to clarify that there is no constitutional requirement dictating how long the House may remain in session after being adjourned indefinitely. Merely not being adjourned for a specific duration does not constitute a constitutional irregularity.”
He cited historical instances where the House had not been adjourned for extended periods, referencing the Lok Sabha‘s sessions in 2008, where meetings continued for several days without interruption. Other examples included sessions in 1987, 1989, 2006, 2013, and 1963, where the House remained in session for 41 to 76 days.
Rijiju emphasized that the government has consistently sought cooperation from the opposition regarding the Delimitation Amendment Bill. He mentioned previous letters sent to Kharge on March 16, March 26, and April 12, 2026, along with personal discussions. During the monsoon session, he also met with opposition leader Rahul Gandhi to solicit support.
The minister accused the Congress party of failing to provide a date for discussions, despite repeated requests. He noted that consultations were held with various parties, including DMK, SP, YSRCP, NCP, Shiv Sena (UBT), AIMIM, and BJD.
In closing, Rijiju expressed his hope that the Congress would take on a constructive role and not obstruct the passage of important legislation.
