Sam Pitroda Discusses Changing Nature of Naxalism, Rejects Violence as a Solution
Sam Pitroda emphasizes dialogue over violence in addressing Naxalism, highlighting its evolution over four decades.
New Delhi, November 12 (Daily Kiran) : Sam Pitroda, president of the Indian Overseas Congress, recently shared his insights on the evolving nature of Naxalism. He noted that the movement he recognized four decades ago has transformed significantly. Rejecting violence in all forms, he stated that while ideological disagreements are natural, resorting to violence is never justified.
Pitroda’s remarks came in response to the BJP’s recent call for the eradication of Naxalism. He explained, “The Naxalism I was familiar with 40 years ago is different from what we see today. Back in my student days, I had some awareness of Naxalism, which was then associated with extremists who felt deprived of their fair share. They believed that the wealthy and powerful had conspired to leave them behind.”
He pointed out that similar inequalities and resource disparities still exist in many parts of the world. However, he observed that the nature and scale of these issues have evolved over time. “Today, there are more wealthy and powerful individuals than ever before in history,” he added.
Discussing Naxalism further, Pitroda remarked, “It is an ideology, and discussions on ideological matters are essential. People can express their disagreements and agreements at the negotiation table. However, when a movement resorts to violence, it fundamentally alters its purpose.”
Referring to ongoing conflicts worldwide, he stated, “I do not condone violence in Gaza, Ukraine, or any other part of the world, including Naxalism. Violence does not solve problems; it exacerbates them.”
He recounted historical conflicts since 1942, mentioning wars from World War II to those in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, the Middle East, and Ukraine. “Regions like Somalia have also experienced prolonged violence and conflict,” he noted.
Concluding his thoughts, Pitroda emphasized that these wars have yielded little in terms of positive outcomes. “Lives are lost, and property is destroyed. We have seen billions spent on weapons, while innocent people suffer. I believe that when Naxalites chose the path of violence, it changed the entire movement. However, I should clarify that I do not consider myself an expert on Naxalites,” he said.
