Skip to content
Saturday, 17 October 2026
BREAKING
Politics

Political Tensions Rise Over Voter List Revision in India

Political tensions escalate as Congress questions the removal of 130 million names from the voter list during a special revision.

New Delhi, September 27 (Daily Kiran) : Political tensions have intensified in New Delhi over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voter list. A fierce exchange unfolded on social media between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress Party. Congress MP Pawan Khera targeted the central government, sharing a BJP post that raised concerns about the credibility of the voter list.

The BJP had previously posted on its official social media account, stating that the SIR process had removed 28 million deceased voters from the list. The party posed a direct question: who benefits from keeping these names on the list? They suggested that the presence of such names could facilitate fraudulent voting. The BJP criticized the opposition alliance, questioning why they would want deceased individuals’ names to remain on the voter list.

In response, Khera countered the BJP’s claims with data. He asserted that under the SIR, a staggering 130 million names were removed from the voter list. While acknowledging the removal of 28 million deceased voters, he pressed for clarification on the remaining 102 million voters.

Khera further questioned the effectiveness of the annual summary revision process if such a large number of deceased names persisted on the list. He asked, “If 28 million deceased individuals were on the voter list, what does that say about the summary revision conducted each year since 2014? Is the BJP admitting to a failure in maintaining the voter list?”

The Congress Party alleges that the SIR is being misused to disproportionately cut voter names, which could undermine democracy. Conversely, the BJP defends the process as essential for cleaning up the voter list and preventing fraudulent voting. They accuse the opposition alliance of wanting to retain deceased voters’ names for political gain.

Tensions continue to rise as both parties prepare for the implications of these revisions on the upcoming elections.

Share